One week ago four were left dead after the shooting at Marysville
Pilchuck High School in Washington, adding one more to the list making
eighty-seven. Eighty-seven school shootings since the tragic day at Sandy Hook
elementary school in Newton Connecticut. Prior to Sandy Hook there had been
close to thirty mass shootings in the country since the Columbine High School
Massacre when thirteen people where killed and twenty-one left wounded. Before Columbine,
mass shootings were rarely heard of in America. However, the day that Eric
Harris and Dylan Klebold opened fire on hundreds of innocent people at
Columbine High, America forever changed. The country took a turn for the worse.
Safety hazards grew along with violence and as smaller shootings became more
common, so did the requirement of monthly lockdown drills. It was decided that it
is necessary for staff and students to always be prepared for danger.
From the
year 1999 when Columbine occurred, to the year 2012, the one shooting that truly
shook the country was the one at Virginia Tech. Before taking his own life twenty-three
year old Seung-Hui Cho killed 32 people on the campus in Blacksburg, Virginia.
After Virginia Tech, hearing of smaller shootings became common again. The ones
that occurred were considered “minor” compared to Virginia and Columbine. Although
undeserving people were still dying and guns were still being put into the
hands of the wrong people, Americans still did not demand a change; they
instead adapted to the killing. It took until December 14th 2012,
the day that Adam Lanza shot and killed twenty kindergarten and first grade
children and eight adults at Sandy Hook elementary school for America to wake
up. The day after tragedy struck at Sandy Hook, millions of Americans,
especially those who lost loved one began protesting for gun control to be
regulated. Lawmakers who in previous years supported gun rights, started to
propose that the nation form a ban on the assault weapons. Was it because the
majority of people killed at Sandy Hook were children or was it because these
American citizens had finally seen enough tragedies that provoked the need to
change?
The country divided in the fight for gun control. Defenders
said that more regulations would violate the Second Amendment, which states "A
well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the
right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringe."
Supporters of the rule believed that gun regulations would create a safer
environment for the country and prevent further shootings. In agreement with
the supporters, Connecticut lawmakers passed the law regarding gun control while
other states, including New York,
Colorado, and Maryland only tightened their
gun laws.
Last week was the eighty-seventh school shooting since Sandy
Hook. There have been eighty-seven school shootings within two years and still
no major changes to the country’s gun control. Parents should not have to doubt
their child’s safety anymore. How can America stop this number from increasing?
Will regulating gun control actually change the growing percentage of school
shootings? Can one law prevent future tragedies? A school used to be considered
a “safe place to learn”, but in the world we live in today, is anywhere
considered a “safe place”?
sources: http://everytown.org/article/schoolshootings/, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-01-31/connecticut-gun-law-passed-after-sandy-hook-ruled-legal.html
Thanks Greta, this is one of your stronger posts. I like that you begin and end with the same references to the Seattle tragedy. This demonstrates that you have command over your argument. I also applaud you for tackling a controversial topic. Much like the controversy surrounding abortion, this issue tends to divide Americans, with both sides arguing aggressively. Finally, thank you for including specific details about the events. Rather than vaguely reference the shootings, you cite names and figures. This gives your post a bit of credibility.
ReplyDeleteThere are a few writing issues that I'd like to address. First, please be aware of how you use the pronoun "it." You don't want to get comfortable using this pronoun, especially when the antecedent is less than clear. You write, "It was decided," "It took until December 14th 2012," and "Was it because." In each of these instances, I know what you mean, but only because I have to work at it a bit. The antecedent is still unclear. In every sentence that you write, you want to make sure that your meaning is clear. In these sentences, your language is a bit vague.
Also, what does this sentence mean: "In agreement with the supporters, Connecticut lawmakers passed the law regarding gun control while other states, including New York, Colorado, and Maryland only tightened their gun laws." Doesn't this sentence just say the same thing about all the states? Am I missing something?
There are other minor issues, but overall, this post was strong.