Rabbits, farmed in Europe and in China, suffer the same
unsanitary and inhumane conditions as the chickens of the American poultry
industry. Any viewer of Robert Kenner’s documentary “Food, Inc.” is familiar
with the crowded hangers in which chicken farmers raise their animals. Similarly,
rabbits produced for their meat spend their entire lives in cages. An
investigative report from the organization CIWF (Compassion In World Farming) exposed
farmers cramming rabbits into cages. They allow the rabbits’ waste and carcasses
to build up underneath the cages’ mesh bottoms, in some instances, in piles “so
high, you’d have to wade across them just to check on the rabbits.” Stalactites
of their feces hang from the bars. Disease spreads quickly. Most of the rabbits
are missing patches of fur, or have eyes so sore they’ve sealed closed with
pus. According to the CIWF, rabbits are treated with more antibiotics that any
other animal except chickens and pigs. The report labels the treatments as
“used to keep these rabbits alive just long enough to get to slaughter.”
Rabbits are the fourth-most farmed animals in the world. Historica
Canada counts over 700 million rabbits produced globally every year. François
Lebas, President of French association Cuniculture, reported in 2008 that Italy
produces over 220,000 tons of rabbit annually. Spain produces 105,000 tons;
France, 80,000 tons. Despite the immensity of this production, there is “no
species-specific legislation protecting the welfare of farmed rabbits in the E.U.”
(CIWF). China, which accounts for 30% of world production, also lacks protection
for rabbits. The Humane Society of the United States says that even the USDA’s interpretation
of the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act (HMSA) allows rabbit farming to go unregulated.
When I first gave this presentation in my French class, my
teacher, Mme. Bird, laughed. Even for someone native to France (and she’s very
loyal to her French culture), I think rabbits struck her as ridiculously
irrelevant to her daily life. But if you look at our care towards our
mass-produced chickens and cows in America, you would think that a similarly
massive production of rabbits in Europe would result in at least a little more
regulation than here. The U.S. has the USDA and the HMSA regulating beef and
poultry, and documentaries like “Food, Inc.” pulling our attention to animal
abuse. Europe has the European Food Safety Authority, which even sets standards
specific to animals like dairy cows and pigs.
But rabbits are overlooked. The fact that Europeans are
bigger rabbit eaters makes no difference between the E.U. and the U.S. in terms
of regulation. At least in the case of rabbits, what we eat does not correspond
to what we care to see regulated.
Josh, the first two paragraphs of this post are very strong. I felt like I was reading an expose written by a professional writer. You write well and you provide well integrated and substantive evidence. I am also impressed that you have written about a unique topic. Oddly, though, the last two paragraphs are less compelling, and I think that is because the writing gets weaker. I get very confused. Let's break it down, sentence by sentence:
ReplyDelete"Even for someone native to France...I think rabbits struck her as ridiculously irrelevant to her daily life." This sentence is technically flawed because "someone" does not equal "I." Mme. Bird needs to be the subject of this sentence because the modifier at the beginning of the sentence talks about her, not you.
"But if you look at our care towards our mass-produced chickens and cows in America, you would think that a similarly massive production of rabbits in Europe would result in at least a little more regulation than here." Why? First, do we really "care" about "chickens and cows in America"? You preface your post by talking about the deplorable conditions of chickens in America, yet now, it appears you're upholding American standards as ideal.
The subsequent sentences are just as confusing, primarily because I'm not sure why you are using the U.S. as a model to follow. Secondly, you seem to imply that "we" are eating rabbits. I don't think this is true. I have never had rabbit in my life, nor do I recall seeing it on an American menu. While this post starts incredibly strong, it leaves me confused. You seem to blur North American countries and European countries.