The issue of police brutality and the tense racial relations
between police and people of color has been on almost everyone’s minds of
late. Just recently, two NYPD officers
were slain in their cars, murdered by a man who was seeking to avenge the
deaths of Mike Brown and Eric Garner who were themselves killed by police while
unarmed. These cases of brutality and injustice have galvanized people into
rival camps of “pro-police” and “anti-police”. Sadly, it does not have to be
this way. Being against police brutality and injustice, and being disgusted
with the actions of the murderer of those two police officers are not two
mutually exclusive issues. Unfortunately, so many on both sides make it out to
be this way.
Putting the
case of Mike Brown aside, where there was much more controversy surrounding
what exactly happened, the cases of Eric Garner, Tamir Rice, and so many others
clearly demonstrate that the police have been overstepping their bounds. Often,
because many of these victims of brutality are black, the black community has
become convinced that the police are out to get them. I don’t know, and highly doubt,
that these police officers and many like them are racist in their intentions.
But it is clear that many aspects of the criminal justice system do
disproportionately impact minorities. The war on drugs has led to the mass
incarceration of countless black men for victimless crimes. Minorities are
disproportionately incarcerated compared to their white counterparts when it
comes to drug use. As of 2006, 49.3% of state prisoners, or 656,000
individuals, were incarcerated for non-violent crimes. This is certainly
unjust. The proliferation of laws and regulations has led to a police force
constantly on the lookout for any wrong or violation, ever so slight, while
taking their attention away from more serious crimes such as murder, rape, and robbery.
In the case of Eric Garner, he was selling untaxed cigarettes. He was choked to
death by a NYPD officer after resisting arrest. So there is some credibility
behind the perception of the police being “out to get” minorities.
At the same time, the impulse of
protesters of police brutality have demonstrated a dangerous tendency to deflect
blame away from guilty perpetrators of brutality onto society at large. This
dangerous tendency only serves to weaken the case for criminal justice reform
and increased dialogue between the black community and law enforcement
officers. When protesters and critics of police brutality deflect
responsibility of the murderer of those two officers onto society at large or
onto the more despicable actions of law enforcement, they only serve to weaken
their own case. Is it not hypocritical to condemn the inexcusable actions on
the part of law enforcement, while at the same time excusing the actions of the
murderer? It is time that individuals are held responsible for their actions.
Blaming “society” does nothing to institute positive, long-lasting change.
Brandon, I feel that you took an interesting and uncommon side to this topic. I like how you took a step back and were able to see it from both perspectives and address how both pro-police and anti-police advocates are both right and wrong in their own ways. You took these situations and made it a chance to criticize society as a whole and their manner of handling traumatic events. Your piece is written very well and includes valid statics to support your case. Although, I wished you had included a few facts about exactly what happened with Michael Brown and Eric Garner as some people may not know. I like how your concluding paragraph ties up the loose ends by stating your opinion on society's way of handling things and how it is in fact detrimental to us in the end. Overall, I really enjoyed reading it.
ReplyDeleteBrandon, this is a good post. I was thoroughly engaged until your last paragraph. You write well, include valid evidence, and address an important topic. Unfortunately, for several reasons, your last paragraph does not work for me. First, your topic sentence is grammatically incorrect and confusing. The subject of this sentence is "impulse." I don't know if an "impulse" can have a "tendency" to do the things you credit it with. You confuse "impulse" with "protesters" - which is merely an object in a prepositional phrase - and therefore, your sentence makes little sense. The paragraph remains confusing, because I am unclear about who the "guilty perpetrators" are. You're talking about those who murder police, right? Or are you talking about Eric Garner and Michael Brown? Or, are you talking about the police who killed them? I gather from your third sentence that you're talking about those who assassinated the police officers in NYC. I wish you would have made that clearer. I also wish you would have proven that there are people who actually "deflect" responsibility away from those assassins. I feel like that voice is not very prominent. I wish you would have convinced me otherwise.
ReplyDeleteRegardless, this is strong. In your introduction, you recognize an unfortunate fact about the human capacity to reason. Too frequently, our minds merely divide issues into dichotomous, opposing issues. It is easier to address issues if we construct artificial comparisons. I appreciate that you try to offer a more nuanced interpretation.