Sunday, December 21, 2014

         The issue of police brutality and the tense racial relations between police and people of color has been on almost everyone’s minds of late.  Just recently, two NYPD officers were slain in their cars, murdered by a man who was seeking to avenge the deaths of Mike Brown and Eric Garner who were themselves killed by police while unarmed. These cases of brutality and injustice have galvanized people into rival camps of “pro-police” and “anti-police”. Sadly, it does not have to be this way. Being against police brutality and injustice, and being disgusted with the actions of the murderer of those two police officers are not two mutually exclusive issues. Unfortunately, so many on both sides make it out to be this way.
            Putting the case of Mike Brown aside, where there was much more controversy surrounding what exactly happened, the cases of Eric Garner, Tamir Rice, and so many others clearly demonstrate that the police have been overstepping their bounds. Often, because many of these victims of brutality are black, the black community has become convinced that the police are out to get them. I don’t know, and highly doubt, that these police officers and many like them are racist in their intentions. But it is clear that many aspects of the criminal justice system do disproportionately impact minorities. The war on drugs has led to the mass incarceration of countless black men for victimless crimes. Minorities are disproportionately incarcerated compared to their white counterparts when it comes to drug use. As of 2006, 49.3% of state prisoners, or 656,000 individuals, were incarcerated for non-violent crimes. This is certainly unjust. The proliferation of laws and regulations has led to a police force constantly on the lookout for any wrong or violation, ever so slight, while taking their attention away from more serious crimes such as murder, rape, and robbery. In the case of Eric Garner, he was selling untaxed cigarettes. He was choked to death by a NYPD officer after resisting arrest. So there is some credibility behind the perception of the police being “out to get” minorities.
At the same time, the impulse of protesters of police brutality have demonstrated a dangerous tendency to deflect blame away from guilty perpetrators of brutality onto society at large. This dangerous tendency only serves to weaken the case for criminal justice reform and increased dialogue between the black community and law enforcement officers. When protesters and critics of police brutality deflect responsibility of the murderer of those two officers onto society at large or onto the more despicable actions of law enforcement, they only serve to weaken their own case. Is it not hypocritical to condemn the inexcusable actions on the part of law enforcement, while at the same time excusing the actions of the murderer? It is time that individuals are held responsible for their actions. Blaming “society” does nothing to institute positive, long-lasting change.    



2 comments:

  1. Brandon, I feel that you took an interesting and uncommon side to this topic. I like how you took a step back and were able to see it from both perspectives and address how both pro-police and anti-police advocates are both right and wrong in their own ways. You took these situations and made it a chance to criticize society as a whole and their manner of handling traumatic events. Your piece is written very well and includes valid statics to support your case. Although, I wished you had included a few facts about exactly what happened with Michael Brown and Eric Garner as some people may not know. I like how your concluding paragraph ties up the loose ends by stating your opinion on society's way of handling things and how it is in fact detrimental to us in the end. Overall, I really enjoyed reading it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Brandon, this is a good post. I was thoroughly engaged until your last paragraph. You write well, include valid evidence, and address an important topic. Unfortunately, for several reasons, your last paragraph does not work for me. First, your topic sentence is grammatically incorrect and confusing. The subject of this sentence is "impulse." I don't know if an "impulse" can have a "tendency" to do the things you credit it with. You confuse "impulse" with "protesters" - which is merely an object in a prepositional phrase - and therefore, your sentence makes little sense. The paragraph remains confusing, because I am unclear about who the "guilty perpetrators" are. You're talking about those who murder police, right? Or are you talking about Eric Garner and Michael Brown? Or, are you talking about the police who killed them? I gather from your third sentence that you're talking about those who assassinated the police officers in NYC. I wish you would have made that clearer. I also wish you would have proven that there are people who actually "deflect" responsibility away from those assassins. I feel like that voice is not very prominent. I wish you would have convinced me otherwise.

    Regardless, this is strong. In your introduction, you recognize an unfortunate fact about the human capacity to reason. Too frequently, our minds merely divide issues into dichotomous, opposing issues. It is easier to address issues if we construct artificial comparisons. I appreciate that you try to offer a more nuanced interpretation.

    ReplyDelete