Ripping stitches, cutting
frantically, executing fabric masterpieces—these are the images you should see
when your casual channel surfing brings you to Lifetime on Thursdays at 9 pm.
Lately, however, Project Runway has failed in showcasing high-fashion looks. Instead,
they have been showcasing something entirely different—the products of their sponsors.
The Emmy-winning television show
squeezes in as much advertisement as they possibly can in their allotted hour
and a half of airtime. Each show has eight commercial breaks, each about three
minutes long. Twenty four minutes of a 90-minute show means 27 percent of the
show is filled with blaring jingles trying to convince viewers that buying this
product will make them a series of adjectives with positive connotations.
This number is fairly average as
far as commercial time to television show ratios go. What sets Project Runway
apart from other television shows (unfortunately) are their sneakier methods of
showing off whatever their sponsors are selling. Each season Project Runway
requires sponsors to supply them with makeup, accessories, sewing machines and a
fashion spread in a magazine. Hearing about these products a dozen times an
episode is annoying, yes, but it at least makes sense. A show about fashion,
advertising brands pertaining to fashion is reasonable. The show commits a serious faux-pas, however,
with their other sponsors: hotels, restaurants, electronic companies, car
companies, and even refrigerator companies. It would be one thing if these
advertisers stayed where they belong—the 24 minutes dedicated solely to them—but
their products bleed into the actual content of the show, compromising the
quality of entertainment.
During earlier seasons of Project
Runway, each week’s challenge was innovative and interesting; whether the
designers were creating a look out of the pajamas they were wearing or making
an evening gown based off of a high school student’s art project. But as the
show gained more and more attention from advertisers—the show’s real
money-maker—sponsored products became the sun around which that week’s challenge
revolved. Most of these challenges are a stretch, I roll my eyes when designers
create looks inspired by a car or a type of soup. Throughout the show, there
are unnecessary and painfully unnatural-seeming shots of the designers praising
the product of the week. Then, when the judges critique the designers’ looks,
there is even more advertising: a guest judge who often has nothing to do with
the fashion industry whose job is to casually mention whatever product their
company is advertising. The show clearly sacrifices quality content for profit,
proving where their priorities truly lie.
These sacrifices are not lost on
viewers. The show lost nearly a third of their viewers from the tenth to
eleventh season, and a quarter of those viewers from the eleventh to twelfth
season, according to TV Line. Countless viewers
have complained of the show being a “sell-out” or, as one anonymous commenter
said, “one big giant commercial” on online forums.
As someone who watches Project
Runway religiously—the way some people watch So You Think You Can Dance—I agree
with the views of these fans and I am extremely disappointed in the direction
taken by such a promising show. Project Runway clearly weighed the importance
of money and sponsors against the importance of fans of the show and chose the
former, making it obvious that the show caters their content towards potential
sponsors and not viewers.
Audrey, this post is great. First, I thank you for writing about a different entertainment medium. Second, I appreciate that you offer very specific evidence - both quantitative and qualitative - to support your claims. I particularly like your final paragraph in which you link increased sponsorship to declining viewership. You don't prove a causal link, but the correlation is strong nonetheless. In the future please just cite your source.
ReplyDeleteOverall, you also write very well in this post. I was engaged and curious the entire time. You write with a very inviting style.
Oddly, despite what is in general a very well written response, there were a couple of technical errors I want to draw your attention to:
"The Emmy-winning television show squeezes in as much advertisement as they" - you confuse your pronoun/antecedent agreement here. The "television show" is singular, yet you use the plural pronoun "they" to modify it. This is wrong.
"A show about fashion, advertising brands pertaining to fashion is reasonable." - What does this mean? The "brands" are not a "show." This sentence is grammatically incorrect. This is called a dangling modifier. The modifier "A show about fashion" is not modifying anything in the sentence, because nothing in the sentence signifies the actual "show."
"Most of these challenges are a stretch, I roll my eyes when designers create looks inspired by a car or a type of soup." - This is a run-on sentence. The comma should be a period.