The media and advertisers have a symbiotic relationship. As
a show gets better TV ratings, the amount of money that advertisers are willing
to pay increases. In short, media is
profit driven, and the principal reason for why they entertain viewers is to get
more money from advertisements. This may seem greedy or corrupt, but in effect,
it allows for an entertaining show to be provided to the audience and viewers
at home alike.
A prime
example of this relationship between the media and advertisers is the show
America’s Got Talent (AGT for short). As a talent show, it draws large audiences each night
that it is on, and many people watch it religiously throughout the entire
season. To the average person, it might just look like a talent show with a lot
of lights and extra excitement from an all-star cast of judges. However, when
looked at with a critical eye, one can see that advertisements are fundamental
to the show, and are what help the show attain bigger audiences and better
talent each year.
On average,
a one-hour show consists of about twenty minutes of commercials. Along with
commercials in between acts, before an act goes on, the host takes a minute to
identify one of the sponsors of the show. For example, Snapple is heavily advertised on
the show. The judges all drink from Snapple cups, and there is even a “Snapple
Save”, which allows a voter to cast their vote to save an act with “The best
stuff”. Because Snapple pays an exorbitant amount of money to advertise on AGT,
they get more air time for their products than other advertisers.
Granted,
this might seem like AGT is catering to companies’ advertisements. However, it
is only natural for them to allow companies like Snapple to sponsor their show.
NBC, the company that produces the show, is profit driven, so they are eager to
have companies advertise on their show because it provides a stream of revenue.
With this revenue, they are able to use some of the money to advertise for
their show, helping them gain recognition, leading to more people knowing about
it, and eventually more people auditioning. Similarly, companies are also
profit driven. They spend thousands of dollars to get a thirty-second add in on
the show because they believe that the show attracts a large audience to whom
their ads target. In the process of looking out for their own interests, AGT provides
a popular and entertaining show in hopes of getting better ratings and more
viewers, and companies advertise on the show in hopes of getting their brand
name and products recognized.
So, to say
that the entertainment and media we watch is actually supporting companies’ advertisements
is an overstatement. If this were so, the role of advertisements and entertainment
would be reversed, and there would be forty minutes of commercials and twenty
minutes of entertainment. Viewership would go down because of the amount of
commercials, causing both the show and the companies who advertised to lose
money. Instead, a balance is held between entertainment, advertisements, and
viewers, allowing for all three parties to be satisfied.
Brandon, I struggle with this post for several reasons. First of all, I find it very vague and nondescript. The only real specific detail that you include is the proper names of America's Got Talent and Snapple. The rest of your description consists of averages and estimates. It appears that you conducted no real research to support your claims. The prompt asked that you quantify the presence of advertising in forms of entertainment that you enjoy. You offer nothing more than rough, unsubstantiated estimates. In addition, your explanation of the relationship between media and sponsors is facile at best. You tell us only what we - presumably - already know.
ReplyDeleteTechnically and stylistically, this response needs work as well. First of all, I encourage you to use verbs more engaging and action-oriented than "to be." Look at your third paragraph. The majority of the verbs you use are just conjugations of the verb "to be." This makes for boring reading. The punctuation in your second sentence makes the sentence grammatically incorrect. I don't understand your use of the word "alike."